[ANSI-Smalltalk] Agenda items...

Andres Valloud andres.valloud at gmail.com
Mon Dec 3 17:03:14 GMT 2007


Paolo,

Ahhhh... ok.  All is well then.  I will make a point of making clear what
notations I use for these things.

What other part of the ANSI spec should we terrorize now?... hhahahaha! :).

Thanks,
Andres.

On Dec 3, 2007 8:56 AM, Paolo Bonzini <paolo.bonzini at lu.unisi.ch> wrote:

>
> > Hmmm... well, but even then, we have that the integer 2^emax is a
> > double, but 2^(emax + 1) is not a double.  Is perhaps the convenience of
> > coincidence the confusing part here?  I didn't mean to write such
> > amounts in any particular mantissa notation.
>
> Yes, most likely.  I interpreted 2^emax as "1*2^emax" which is not LIA
> because the mantissa is 1.
>
> Paolo
>
> _______________________________________________
> ANSI-Smalltalk mailing list
> ANSI-Smalltalk at lists.openskills.org
> http://lists.openskills.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ansi-smalltalk
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.openskills.org/pipermail/ansi-smalltalk/attachments/20071203/dd69da73/attachment.html


More information about the ANSI-Smalltalk mailing list