[ANSI-Smalltalk] what to work on first
John O'Keefe
wembley.instantiations at gmail.com
Fri Nov 16 13:40:41 GMT 2007
I agree that files, sockets, (and streams since they relate strongly
to both) are a good starting point for the next revision of the
standard.
One way to judge what we should work on first is to ask cross-dialect
feature developers what gives them the most pain. What areas of
standardization would make Seaside, Glorp, Aida, Refactoring Browser,
Toothpick, etc. easier to port?
John
On Nov 16, 2007 8:24 AM, Ralph Johnson <johnson at cs.uiuc.edu> wrote:
> I was looking at the list at http://smalltalk.gnu.org/wiki/ansi-smalltalk
>
> First, I know that people should work on the things that interest
> them. That will keep the energy up. However, I want to work on
> things that are easy and that have the potential to make big
> improvements. So, I want to propose something.
>
> I think that one of the first things we should work on is a standard
> for files and sockets. The ANSI standard about files is not really
> very serious. I think it would be fairly easy to make a good standard
> for file and network IO. This would make programs more portable
> without causing much trouble to vendors. It would provide an early
> success.
>
> -Ralph
>
> _______________________________________________
> ANSI-Smalltalk mailing list
> ANSI-Smalltalk at lists.openskills.org
> http://lists.openskills.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ansi-smalltalk
>
--
John O'Keefe [|], Principal Smalltalk Developer, Instantiations Inc.
More information about the ANSI-Smalltalk
mailing list