[ANSI-Smalltalk] Next up

[Paolo Bonzini]

James Foster wrote:
> I'd like to second Eliot's comments that we need to discuss goals. One 
> of the characteristics of the present standard is the "spartan" nature. 
> Personally, I like that. My impression is that leaving out Association 
> was not an oversight, but a considered decision to support a minimal 
> implementation (say, subject to extreme size constraints).
> 
> Actually, I'd start with an errata to identify clear errors and typos.

Both plans (yours and Eliot's) sound great with me.

I can offer wiki space on http://smalltalk.gnu.org/, or we can use the 
openskills wiki too.

Paolo