[ANSI-Smalltalk] Next up

[James Foster]

Bruce Badger wrote:
> How about if we break down the work into the following broad areas;
>
> Admin:  Getting the project started, looking after the mail list server etc etc
>
> Meta:  The structure of the project work and the form of the standard document
>
> Smalltalk: Specifying the standard elements of a Smalltalk system
>
> I think these three are pretty orthogonal so we should be able to
> tackle them all at the same time without too much disruption between
> them.  For example, we can talk about Association regardless of
> whether all the INCITS forms are completed or whether we want to
> establish sub-committees for some of the more complex/contentious
> work.
I don't mind the Smalltalk discussion proceeding as long as they 
understand that the Meta decisions will impact their proposals. For 
example, the Association advocates can create a full proposal, but the 
Meta group might exclude it from the Core/Kernel. Which is to say, the 
decision of what is contentious might itself be contentious!

James