[ANSI-Smalltalk] Mail list configuration
Craig Latta
craig at netjam.org
Mon Oct 29 03:37:21 GMT 2007
James Foster writes:
> Google for "Reply considered harmful" and consider the arguments in
> the first link, http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html.
Hear, hear! Many is the time I've seen sensitive, damaging
information go out in group replies that the responder thought was going
only to the original sender.
thanks,
-C
p.s.
While I'm here, I'd like to put in a plea for keeping subscribers'
email addresses as confidential as possible. I don't mind random people
knowing the names of the subscribers, but there's no reason to tell them
our email addresses too (thus guaranteeing more junk mail for each of
us). Some mailing lists even go to the trouble of obfuscating sender
email addresses in archived messages, which I think is a great idea.
--
Craig Latta
improvisational musical informaticist
www.netjam.org
Smalltalkers do: [:it | All with: Class, (And love: it)]
More information about the ANSI-Smalltalk
mailing list