[ANSI-Smalltalk] What do the vendors think?

[John O'Keefe]

> I favor an open process. I favor universal access. This isn't how ANSI
> is structured. I suggest that there be two groups: One would be the ANSI
> group, using ANSI process, producing an ANSI standard. The other would
> be a Smalltalk Language Issues group (or some such name), sponsored
> perhaps by STIC (or by no existing organization) whose charter is to
> explore Smalltalk protocol options and make recommendations to the ANSI
> group. This process, and the resulting recommendations, would be public.

Martin said this so much better than I did :-)  I think this is the
right direction -- it provides the best of both worlds.
-- 
John O'Keefe [|], Principal Smalltalk Developer, Instantiations Inc.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.openskills.org/pipermail/ansi-smalltalk/attachments/20080205/b881c400/attachment.html