[ANSI-Smalltalk] What do the vendors think?

[Bruce Badger]

On 05/02/2008, Paolo Bonzini <bonzini at gnu.org> wrote:
>
> > I favor an open process. I favor universal access. This isn't how ANSI
> > is structured. I suggest that there be two groups: One would be the ANSI
> > group, using ANSI process, producing an ANSI standard. The other would
> > be a Smalltalk Language Issues group (or some such name), sponsored
> > perhaps by STIC (or by no existing organization) whose charter is to
> > explore Smalltalk protocol options and make recommendations to the ANSI
> > group. This process, and the resulting recommendations, would be public.
>
> I like this.

I agree, and its very much along the lines of a suggestion made by
Ralph on the 18th Dec.

This would mean that we really do still need our own process, but
separate from that we need to encourage a few people to be in the
INCITS committee.  We must then hope that the formal committee
reflects the spirit of the open process :-)

-- 
Make the most of your skills - with OpenSkills
http://www.openskills.org/