[ANSI-Smalltalk] What's in a name?

[bwbadger at gmail.com]

It is human nature to jump onto the issues that easily fit into the
brain, and I'm more susceptable to this than most.  Sorry, Paolo. :-(

I'm hoping we can just go with Smalltalk Standards Project given the
enormously elequent arguments in it's favor, but if that is not the
vase then it'll have to be a vote.

Paolo,  Nobody (so far) has objected to the jist of your proposal so
unles anyone objects I suggest that your proposal become STEP document
zero, and we start to apply the STEP process to the STEP definition.
Doest that make sense?

All the best,
    Bruce


On 22/02/2008, Paolo Bonzini <bonzini at gnu.org> wrote:
>
> > Shall we have a vote? :-)
>
> Quick, if it has to be.  I'd very much prefer to see brain cycles spent
> on critique of my draft. :-)
>
> Paolo
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ANSI-Smalltalk mailing list
> ANSI-Smalltalk at lists.openskills.org
> http://lists.openskills.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ansi-smalltalk
>


-- 
Make the most of your skills - with OpenSkills
http://www.openskills.org/