[ANSI-Smalltalk] Response to the first draft of our project
application
Bruce Badger
bwbadger at gmail.com
Mon Jan 7 14:58:45 GMT 2008
On 07/01/2008, Paolo Bonzini <paolo.bonzini at lu.unisi.ch> wrote:
> Ralph Johnson wrote:
> > So, how about if we make a standard and promote it under our own name?
> Right, that's what people do with Python Enhancement Proposals, Ruby
> Community Requests, and for Java itself too.
I think the ANSI process gives us a couple of things:
o Process (:-)) - in particular a mechanism for reaching consensus
o Gravitas - people understand that an ANSI standard is something of substance
I didn't look to ANSI for any promotion or marketing value, though
saying ANSI will add weight to a marketing message.
For the process part - who has a good one? Can we mirror what ANSI
does by having an elected "board" or some such that has a final say on
things?
For gravitas, we'd just have to earn that.
All the best,
Bruce
--
Make the most of your skills - with OpenSkills
http://www.openskills.org/
More information about the ANSI-Smalltalk
mailing list