[ANSI-Smalltalk] Response to the first draft of our project application

[Andres Valloud]

I think this is a good idea.  After all, to a point, dealing with the
rubberstamping (so to speak) group would be additional work for us on top of
building the standard in the first place.  IMO, the least overhead possible
the better.

I feel the standard we create should gain credibility because of the people
that participate in its creation, e.g.: all major vendors.

Thanks,
Andres.

On Jan 7, 2008 6:56 AM, peter van rooijen <peter at vanrooijen.com> wrote:

> > So, how about if we make a standard and promote it under our own name?
> >  After all, who is OMG to create standards, but they did anyway.  The
> > only real advantage to having an organization like INCITS involved is
> > for advertising.  They don't necessarily make the standard better, and
> > don't really promote it.
> >
> > If we later decide that we want to have a big name behind the
> > standard, we can join up with a group and follow their rules.
>
> Makes sense to me!
>
> Cheers, Peter
>
> > -Ralph
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > ANSI-Smalltalk mailing list
> > ANSI-Smalltalk at lists.openskills.org
> > http://lists.openskills.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ansi-smalltalk
> >
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ANSI-Smalltalk mailing list
> ANSI-Smalltalk at lists.openskills.org
> http://lists.openskills.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ansi-smalltalk
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.openskills.org/pipermail/ansi-smalltalk/attachments/20080109/7dc5773a/attachment.htm