[ANSI-Smalltalk] Next STEPs
Craig Latta
craig at netjam.org
Thu Mar 6 17:59:32 GMT 2008
Hi--
Martin writes:
> ...I'd add that we should be careful and not get carried away piling
> things up too high. There are many good ideas out there that are no
> doubt handy in many circumstances, but not all of them should go into
> the standard. It's important that in the end the standard as a whole
> is powerful, but coherent and that it sticks to the principle of a
> minimal number of simple but powerful building elements. So let's
> consider as many suggestions as we can, but let's be very selective in
> what we actually put in, considering each one in the context of the
> whole set.
>
> If we don't manage to keep the standard "lean and mean", few will be
> willing to plow through hundreds of pages of it, let alone bother
> complying with it. Especially if we intend to stick to the existing
> compliance criteria, where compliant implementation MUST implement
> everything defined in the standard.
Hear, hear!
-C
--
Craig Latta
improvisational musical informaticist
www.netjam.org
Smalltalkers do: [:it | All with: Class, (And love: it)]
More information about the ANSI-Smalltalk
mailing list