[ANSI-Smalltalk] A list of interesting methods,
not present in the ANSI standard
Bruce Badger
bwbadger at gmail.com
Sun Mar 16 21:33:24 GMT 2008
Andres,
On 16/03/2008, Andres Valloud <andres.valloud at gmail.com> wrote:
> The intent of going through this list is as expressed before: to propose the
> inclusion of de-facto standard messages into the actual standard, as long as
> we all agree of course.
I guess it's good to look at things in a number of ways, and I'm not
suggesting that such lists are unhelpful. I was just wondering how to
move towards structuring the STEPs that contain these selectors. I
suspect that one big STEP for everything won't work :-) This then
begs the question of how we break things down, hence the thoughts
about relatively small STEPs that address narrow "aspects" of what
should be found in a standard image.
> Just in case... out of the list for which you ask questions (e.g. on deep
> copy, broadcasting etc), I pruned out most of the methods and boiled it down
> to the considerable smaller list
Ah, sorry. I should have ignored those.
> Perhaps become: is problematic, and this is something I'd like to figure
> out. Isn't become: two-way in all Smalltalks by now?
I don't know. Having been bitten by this in the past I am always now
wary. Perhaps I need to forget that old lesson.
> The message identityHash is necessary for (customary) implementations of
> things like MethodDictionary, IdentityDictionary, and IdentitySet. I do not
> know of any Smalltalk that does not use identityHash for these purposes.
Just my ignorance again. I have never come across this as an
application programmer :-]
All the best,
Bruce
--
Make the most of your skills - with OpenSkills
http://www.openskills.org/
More information about the ANSI-Smalltalk
mailing list