[ANSI-Smalltalk] #peekFor:
Bruce Badger
bwbadger at gmail.com
Wed Oct 1 08:28:27 BST 2008
Richard,
On 01/10/2008, Richard O'Keefe <ok at cs.otago.ac.nz> wrote:
...
> I propose the following replacement for the definition:
>
> Definition: <gettableStream>
> If the receiver has no future sequence values,
> returns false. Otherwise, determines the result of
> sending #= to the first object in the receiver's
> future sequence values with anObject as the argument.
> If that is false, return false with no change to the
> receiver's state. If #= answers true, the first
> object is removed from the receiver's future sequence
> values and appended to the end of the receiver's past
> sequence values, then true is returned.
This makes sense to me, but we need somewhere to put it ...
So what we need here is s STEP that presents the existing ANSI
standard collection protocol and then a separate STEP which proposes a
delta (such as yours above).
Would you be up for owning there STEP documents? :-)
Best regards,
Bruce
--
Make the most of your skills - with OpenSkills
http://www.openskills.org/
More information about the ANSI-Smalltalk
mailing list