[ANSI-Smalltalk] #contents on <collectionStream> (was:
#contents on WriteStream)
cstb
jas at cruzio.com
Sat Oct 18 06:36:48 BST 2008
At 12:14 AM 10/16/2008, Paulo wrote:
>In the standard, the definition of #contents for <WriteStream> comes
>from <collectionStream> so that this:
>
> (WriteStream on: String new) nextPutAll: 'abc'; skip: -1;
> contents
>
>should "return a collection that contains the receiver's past and future
>sequence values, in order", i.e. 'abc'. To me it makes more sense that
>it returns 'ab'.
>
>Opinions?
It would be nice if the standard was
for <collectionStream> to provide both
contents -> upTo: readLimit
and
currentContents -> upTo: position
-Jim
More information about the ANSI-Smalltalk
mailing list