Fair enough.<br><br>Andres.<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 7:56 PM, Bruce Badger <<a href="mailto:bwbadger@gmail.com">bwbadger@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
On 26/02/2008, Andres Valloud <<a href="mailto:andres.valloud@gmail.com">andres.valloud@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> I just went over the STEP document. Something I noticed is that there is a<br>
> license TBD. Since the STEP document is in the public domain, then at first<br>
> sight it seems reasonable to me that all STEPs remain in the public domain.<br>
> Objections?<br>
<br>
No objection from me in principle, but it may be better to go with a<br>
permissive creative commons license, the reason being that CC has been<br>
lawyered to work (pretty much) everywhere but our understanding of<br>
"public domain" may not apply everywhere.<br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
--<br>
Make the most of your skills - with OpenSkills<br>
<a href="http://www.openskills.org/" target="_blank">http://www.openskills.org/</a><br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
ANSI-Smalltalk mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:ANSI-Smalltalk@lists.openskills.org">ANSI-Smalltalk@lists.openskills.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.openskills.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ansi-smalltalk" target="_blank">http://lists.openskills.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ansi-smalltalk</a><br>
</font></blockquote></div><br>