[smalltalk-central] Task list
eric at thewingers.net
Wed Sep 27 15:22:29 BST 2006
On Sep 26, 2006, at 3:35 PM, Mark D. Roberts wrote:
> At 03:49 AM 9/27/2006, David Buck wrote:
>> How do others feel about audio?
> I think it's essential.
I found this example that does not use audio. I don't think it's a
poorly done demonstration at all. But I think that there's a certain
linearness that makes aspects hard to follow.
The problem may be that the explanation, is presented in text. Then the
action is performed afterwards requiring me to remember what I just
read. With audio, I can understand the intent as the action is
> Without audio, either we have to use a bunch of text captions to
> signpost everything that's happening, or else we are expecting that
> the spectators are going to be paying very close attention to every
> little detail that appears on the screen.
> Text captions to signpost everything will slow down the pace of
> narration and make the screen cast feel like watching an early silent
> film. And I think it's a mistake to assume that the spectator is
> watching everything closely, actually reading the names of the menu
> items, etc. Most viewers are going to watch this sort of thing in a
> state of distraction. Probably, they are watching a screen cast
> because they want to see and hear, not read and imagine. The narration
> is there to make it easier for them, to reduce the burden of focusing
> the attention on tiny details like menu names. We should assume that
> the spectators are not going to want to make a lot of effort following
> such details.
> If the technology can't produce decent audio, then it just seems like
> a waste of time. My rule of thumb for all of this is that "good
> enough" simply isn't. It has to be REALLY good.
> smalltalk-central mailing list
> smalltalk-central at lists.openskills.org
More information about the smalltalk-central